On Bans and Next Steps Looking Beyond the Top 8 Increased total graveyard hate increased success (to a point)ħ. Top decks with graveyard hate had mixed performanceĥb. Here's a table of contents to help you skip around if you need to:ĥa. Finally, I'm going to bring it all together and establish some data-driven conclusions specific to Hogaak and graveyard hate at MC4. This will help us understand the limits and context of MCs relative to events like GPs or MTGO tournaments. Second, I'm going to identify key dynamics underlying MCs more broadly. First, I'm going to discuss the significant limitations of Top 8-level data, both to frame our MC4 analysis and as a caution for future events. In that spirit, I'm going to tackle three topics today. We must also understand the limits of extrapolating from the MC4 generally. Instead, we must carefully unpack the data bonanza that came out of this weekend. It is very easy to reduce MC4 to "ban Hogaak" and leave it at that, but we must not fall into this trap. Those claims also need data to back them up. These are important topics and questions for writers and readers to engage, but they need to start with an honest, accurate, and thorough breakdown of the MC4 itself. bannability, Modern's graveyard fixation, Faithless Looting, and a number of related issues. This will inevitably include strong claims about Modern's health or lack thereof, Hogaak's suitability vs. Post-MC4 Modern content is, and will continue to be, focused on Hogaak.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |